Skip to content
SKHunterSASKATCHEWAN

SKHUNTER · PRACTICAL LEARNING

Harvest care practice

Practise the decisions that connect retrieval, cooling, identification, testing and a useful harvest record.

Use these exercises to revisit the lessons. Refreshing this page or changing language clears your answers.

All practice situations

Showing 6 of 6 situations

Situation 01Harvest care practice

Two coolers at the handover

At the end of a trip, two hunters bring labelled meat batches to the same handover point. One label has become unreadable, and a companion suggests combining the packages because both batches came from the same outing.

What should be resolved before packages change hands?

Choose the next step

Read the answer and explanations

Best next stepKeep the batches separate and resolve each package’s animal and record identifiers.

Why each choice matters

  1. Combine the batches and keep whichever label is still readable.

    A shared trip does not make the animals or their records interchangeable; combining them destroys the unresolved link.

  2. Let the recipient identify the unlabelled batch after unpacking.

    Later appearance or memory may not reconnect a package to the correct animal, testing status or handling record.

  3. Keep the batches separate and resolve each package’s animal and record identifiers.

    Traceable identifiers connect the handover to the right animal and handling information instead of assigning confidence by proximity.

Situation 02Harvest care practice

A submitted CWD sample is not a result

Your sample registration has a tracking number, but no final result is visible yet. A different animal from the same trip has a completed result, and the freezer packages were labelled before both records were checked together.

How should the pending animal’s status be recorded?

Choose the next step

Read the answer and explanations

Best next stepKeep it pending and match the animal, sample and package identifiers in the official record.

Why each choice matters

  1. Copy the completed animal’s result because the trip and area were the same.

    A result belongs to its matched animal and sample; a nearby animal’s record does not supply the missing result.

  2. Keep it pending and match the animal, sample and package identifiers in the official record.

    Registration confirms a process step, not a negative finding. Matching identifiers prevents the wrong result being attached later.

  3. Mark the batch cleared once it has stayed frozen.

    Freezer storage is not a CWD result or a way to remove CWD risk; it cannot settle the testing status.

Situation 03Harvest care practice

A cold-feeling cooler needs evidence

Bird packages arrive in a cooler that still contains ice, and the outside of the lid feels cold. The group has no temperature record from the trip, and some packages were added at a different time from the others.

What provides a more useful basis for assessing the handling record?

Choose the next step

Read the answer and explanations

Best next stepMeasure and record the actual conditions, keeping timing and batches identifiable.

Why each choice matters

  1. Measure and record the actual conditions, keeping timing and batches identifiable.

    A measurement describes the present conditions; paired with the handling timeline, it is better evidence than touching the lid, though it cannot recreate missing history.

  2. Treat visible ice as proof every package stayed properly chilled throughout.

    Remaining ice does not establish the temperature of every package or what happened before it was put in the cooler.

  3. Rely on normal smell to fill the missing temperature record.

    Smell is not a measurement of cold-chain conditions and cannot recover an unrecorded handling history.

Situation 04Harvest care practice

Before changing a bird for transport

You are preparing migratory game birds for a journey and a possible transfer to someone else. A companion remembers a transport rule from an older trip, but your current plan differs in preparation, packaging and who will possess the birds.

What should be checked before removing identifying parts or completing the transfer?

Choose the next step

Read the answer and explanations

Best next stepCheck current federal identification and transfer requirements against this exact plan.

Why each choice matters

  1. Use the old trip’s arrangement because all game birds share one transport rule.

    Requirements depend on the bird and circumstances; an old arrangement does not establish the evidence or labels needed for this journey.

  2. Keep a species photograph and assume it replaces all required evidence.

    A photograph can support your personal record, but it does not automatically replace the evidence or labelling required by the current rules.

  3. Check current federal identification and transfer requirements against this exact plan.

    Preparation, possession and handover details matter; verifying them first avoids destroying evidence that may need to remain with the bird.

Situation 05Harvest care practice

The convenient drop-off has an unavailable note

You plan a CWD sample drop-off on the drive home and find an official directory entry marked unavailable. Another nearby point appears on the map, but its current hours, capacity and sample acceptance have not been confirmed.

What should the travel plan use as its next step?

Choose the next step

Read the answer and explanations

Best next stepChoose a confirmed alternative and check the current submission instructions before travel.

Why each choice matters

  1. Drive to the unavailable entry because the map still shows its location.

    A location can remain listed while service is unavailable; the marker does not override the explicit status note.

  2. Choose a confirmed alternative and check the current submission instructions before travel.

    Current availability and acceptance determine whether the stop is workable; a backup avoids relying on an unchecked map entry.

  3. Assume the next map point accepts samples whenever the first cannot.

    Neighbouring entries are separate services. The first site’s status establishes nothing about the second site’s hours or capacity.

Situation 06Harvest care practice

A group summary and an individual survey

After an outing, a partner sends a message summarizing the whole group’s observations and harvest. You have your own licence and HAL account, but you have not checked whether your individual survey is required or recorded as submitted.

What closes your own reporting task?

Choose the next step

Read the answer and explanations

Best next stepCheck the current survey instructions and your own account’s submission record.

Why each choice matters

  1. Check the current survey instructions and your own account’s submission record.

    A personal requirement and its recorded completion need a personal check; the group summary is useful supporting information, not proof of submission.

  2. Save the group message as evidence everyone has completed the survey.

    The message describes the trip, but it does not establish that the relevant individual account received the required information.

  3. Assume a partner’s submission also covers your licence unless you hear otherwise.

    Another person’s record cannot be treated as your own confirmation; account and licence scope must be checked rather than inferred.